NANDKUMAR MANIKRAO PADWAL AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/12802/2026 · 2026-09-22
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14052 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14052 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
*1* notional increment IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12042 OF 2026 Miss Padma Tirupati Peddalwar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Mr. Govind R. Ingole, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. M. N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 ... AND WRIT PETITION NO.12781 OF 2026 Mahesh Yashwant Raje and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Mr. Abhay M. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent/State ... AND WRIT PETITION NO.12786 OF 2026 Sunil Madhukarrao Raut and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others Mr. Santosh N. Pawde, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent/State … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12802 OF 2026 Nandkumar Manikrao Padwal and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Narwade 2026:BHC-AUG:44305-DB
*2* notional increment Mr. Madde Shrikant B., Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent/State … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12803 OF 2026 Nagnath Bhagwantrao Kale and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. B. B. Bhise, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 & 7 … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12804 OF 2026 Muntajiboddin Abdul Wahab Shaikh and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Mr. Kakasaheb B. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondent/State … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12805 OF 2026 Arjun Govardhan Waghmare and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. B. B. Bhise, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12806 OF 2026 Ram Chandrabhan Ingole and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Narwade
*3* notional increment Mr. Rhishikesh A. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for Respondent/State … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12807 OF 2026 Angad Dyanoba Khot and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. B. B. Bhise, Advocate for Respondent No.3 … AND WRIT PETITION NO.12808 OF 2026 Futane Madhukar Rajaram and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Mr. Shrikant B. Madde, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.
S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent/State …
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 22nd AUGUST 2026 P. C. :-
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. Indisputably, the issue raised in these Petitions is squarely covered by the orders dated 3rd July, 2026 passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court at Circuit Bench at Kolhapur in Writ Petition No. 5445 of 2026 and dated 19th June, 2026 in Writ Petition No. 3412 of 2026. 3. Reliance is also placed on order dated 18th March, 2026 Narwade
*4* notional increment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Bombay in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 4. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. The Petitioners would be entitled for monetary benefits / difference of pensionary benefits as per the actuals w.e.f. their respective dates of superannuation, provided they have worked for 6 months or more in the last year up to their superannuation. b. The pensionary benefits of the Petitioners would be recalculated by including the annual increment in their last drawn salary prior to their superannuation and such recalculated pensionary benefits shall be payable to them. c. Arrears if any, shall be paid to them within a period of 90 days. Many of the Petitioners have approached belatedly before this Court and, therefore, akin to the orders passed in several matters, they would not be entitled for the interest component. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Narwade