Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14052 (AP)

P.SAI VAYU SUDHA AND 3 OTHERS v. CHINTHADI VISHNU AND ANOTHER

CRP/5691/2004 · 2026-01-27

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010140942004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5691 OF 2004 Between: 1. P.SAI VAYU SUDHA AND 3 OTHERS, W/o. Late Rama Rao, R.No. 2, H.No. 7-119, Chanakayapur Colony, R.R.Pet, Eluru, 2. Kum.Peddireddi Babi @ Baby,, D/o. Late Rama Rao, R.No. 2, H.No. 7-119, Chanakayapur Colony, R.R.Pet, Eluru, 3. Kum.Peddireddi Sailaja,, D/o. Late Rama Rao, R.No. 2, H.No. 7-119, Chanakayapur Colony, R.R.Pet, Eluru, 4. Peddireddi Satya Swaroop,, S/o. Late Rama Rao, R.No. 2, H.No. 7-119, Chanakayapur Colony, R.R.Pet, Eluru, ...Petitioners AND 1. CHINTHADI VISHNU AND ANOTHER, S/o. Suryanarayana, Cultivator, Kaikaram, Unguturu Mandal, Tadepalligudem, 2. Peddireddy Seethamahalakshmi, W/o. K.Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi @ Murali Krishna, Moghal Khalana, Kulsumpura, H.No. 13-6-826/B/9A, Flat No. 8, Lunger House, ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: RAMA RAO GHANTA Counsel for the Respondents: S SUBBA REDDY 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P. Prabhakar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri G. Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners that the present Revision Petitioners do not have any interest in the subject property for the time being, inasmuch as same has been sold away to third parties and that the said third parties have filed Application for impleadment in the pending Appeal Suit. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners also submits that he had also written a letter to the Petitioners to find out about their interest, but the Petitioners have not evinced any interest in responding to the letter. 3. Having so recorded, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Needless to state that the right of the third party purchasers to approach this Court to challenge the impugned Order in the Civil Revision Petition shall always be open, subject to all just exceptions. No Order as to Costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 28.01.2026 JKS 3 56 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5691 OF 2004 28.01.2026 JKS