M/S BALAJI TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR NAVEEP MITTAL v. NORTHERN RAILWAYS
ARB/116/2026 · 2026-04-17
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1405 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1405 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-116-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 M/S BALAJI TRADERS THROUGH PROPRIETOR
....Petitioner(s) Versus NORTHERN RAILWAYS
.....Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr.Ravinder Singh Virdi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinish Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
, J. (Oral)
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent has stated that he has sought instructions to state that the due amount which the petititioner is claiming shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today. He has also supplied a copy of letter dated 16.04.2026, which is taken on record as Mark-X.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage with a liberty to revive the same in case the aforesaid amount is not paid within the aforesaid stipulated period.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 17.04.2026 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) rakesh JUDGE Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2026.04.18 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment