Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1405 (JHR)

RAVI ORAON v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./11/2026 · 2026-01-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:463) 1 Cr.M.P. No.11 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 11 of 2026 1. Ravi Oraon, s/o Mangaldeo Oraon, aged about 25 years, 2. Ajit Lohra, s/o Baleshwar Lohra, aged about 25 years Both resident of Village-Jagaldaga, P.O.-Udaypura, P.S.-Latehar, Dist.-Latehar, Jharkhand .... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ….. For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Bhushan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P. ….. By the Court:- 1. Heard the parties. 2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the prayer to set aside the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 195 of 2024 by which the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar has issued written proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. consequent upon the petitioners absconding and concealing themselves to evade their arrest and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar has also fixed the time and place for appearance of the petitioners. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted (2026:JHHC:463) 2 Cr.M.P. No.11 of 2026 by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were not present at the place of occurrence. Hence, it is submitted that the written proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. ought not to have been allowed. 4. Learned Spl. P.P. on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer and submits that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar has categorically recorded its satisfaction that the accused persons of the case i.e. the petitioners herein are absconding and concealing themselves to evade their arrest and after being so satisfied has directed for issuance of written proclamation fixing the time and place for appearance of the accused persons of the case. Hence, it is submitted that there is no illegality in the said order and therefore, this criminal miscellaneous petition being without any merit be dismissed. 5. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials available in the record, this Court finds that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar has recorded its satisfaction that the petitioners are absconding and concealing themselves to evade their arrest and after being so satisfied has directed for issuance of written proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. hence, there is no illegality in the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 195 of 2024 warranting interference of this Court with the same in exercise of the power under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023. (2026:JHHC:463) 3 Cr.M.P. No.11 of 2026 6. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition being without any merit is dismissed. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 9th January, 2026 AFR/Sonu-Gunjan/- Uploaded on 12/01/2026