Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1405 (AP)

KANURU NAGESWARA RAO v. MIKKILINENI SRI RAMA KRISHNA

CRP/1330/2026 · 2026-04-30

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010174272026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1330/2026 Between: 1. KANURU NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. JAGANANDAM, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 101, PARIMILA RESIDENCY, TIRUVURU ROAD, MYLAVARAM, NTR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MIKKILINENI SRI RAMA KRISHNA, S/o. Venkateswara Rao Aged about 68 years, R/o. Flat No.203, Tarakrishna Residency, 4th Line, Chalasani Nagar, Kanuru, Penamaluru Mandal, Vijayawada, NTR District Erstwhile Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobegs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Honourable court against the docket order dated 30.03.2026 in OS.No.8 of 2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada for the following among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the order in OS.No.8 of 2 2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada dated 30.03.2026 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay of all further proceeding in OS.No.8 of 2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, pending disposal of the above revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the civil revision petition became infructuous. 2. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 01.05.2026 ARR 4 73 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1330/2026 Date: 01.05.2026 ARR