Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14049 (KAR)

B T SANTHOSHKUMAR v. SMT. KAVANA @ M K SAHANA

RPFC/69/2026 · 2026-03-17

K Manmadha Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16428 RPFC No. 69 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 69 OF 2026 BETWEEN: B.T SANTHOSHKUMAR S/O THAMMANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.697, TENT OPPOSITE ROAD, HOSA BEEDI, HINAKAL, MYSURU. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SAI. LAKSHMI SURAJ, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.V. SUBRAMANYA PRASAD.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.KAVANA @ M.K. SAHANA D/O. KUMAR, W/O.SANTHOSHKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT. KANASINA MANE, 1ST CROSS, HANIYAMBADI ROAD, NEAR LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA TEMPLE, KAVERI NAGAR, MANDYA. 2. JASHWIK S/O BT SANTHOSHKUMAR AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.2 IS A MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN, i.e, RESPONDENT NO.1 SMT. KAVANA @ M.K.SAHANA, R/AT. KANASINA MANE, 1ST CROSS, HANIYAMBADI ROAD, Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16428 RPFC No. 69 of 2026 NEAR LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA TEMPLE, KAVERI NAGAR, MANDYA. …RESPONDENTS THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.05.2024 PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.106/2023 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MANDYA., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF CR.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh petition in accordance with law before the appropriate Court. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE MH/-