IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10445 of 2026 Decided on: 03.07.2026 Madhu Bharti and another …….Petitioners Versus State of HP and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?19 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that as after the filing of the petition, the petitioner has been granted the requisite benefits, the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this petition but with liberty that if still there is any surviving grievance of the petitioners, they may approach the Court afresh for redressal thereof. The petition is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 03, 2026 (narender) 19 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?