ANURADHA KUMARI AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/10345/2026 · 2026-07-02
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14043 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14043 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 10345 of 2026.
Decided on : 2
nd July
, 2026.
Anuradha Kumari & Ors. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
....Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Narvadha Kashyap, Advocate For respondents No.1 to 3: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.4: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 respectively.
2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with direction that representations (Annexure P-1, Colly) filed by the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of 12 weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 2nd July, 2026.
(jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?