$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1647/2026, CM APPL. 48862-64/2026 SUDHA JAINA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sangeeta Jain, Adv. Along with Petitioner in person. versus DR. ER. RAJAINDERR JAINA .....Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 29.07.2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Order dated 03.06.2026 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, South-East District in an application filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 16 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as, „CPC‟) and Section 21 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as, „HMA‟) filed in HMA. No. 887/2022 titled Dr. Er. Rajainderr Jaina v. Sudha Jaina. 2. By way of the impugned order, the learned Judge rejected the aforesaid application filed on behalf of the petitioner, holding that no ground under Order VI Rule 16 of the CPC was made out. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought may instead be available under Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC or any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/07/2026 at 13:32:31 other provisions of the CPC. She, therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate application, as may be permissible in law. 4. In view of the above, the present petition, along with all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with aforesaid liberty as prayed for. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J JULY 29, 2026 p/kz This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/07/2026 at 13:32:31