ALI MOHAMMAD S/O YUSUF @ ISHAB v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3663/2026 · 2026-04-01
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1403 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1403 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13496] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3663/2026 Ali Mohammad S/o Yusuf @ Ishab, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Dadhet, Police Station, Pahadi, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 01/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.326/2019 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341 and 354 of IPC, 1860.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He contends that on the same allegation, an FIR was lodged by the petitioner against the complainant side and other members. Although a specific act has been attributed to the present petitioner for causing grievous injuries to the injured person-Sad Mohammad but there is no medical opinion to establish that these injuries are dangerous to life. He again submits that co-accused Alam has been enlarged on
[2026:RJ-JP:13496] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3663/2026] bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
04.08.2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.02.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that in the present matter, the FIR was lodged in the year 2018 and since 2019 the petitioner has been absconding and charge-sheet was filed under Section 299 of the CrPC.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions advanced by
learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ali Mohammad S/o Yusuf @ Ishab, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/27