Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14029 (CHH)

NIRMAL KUMAR AGRAWAL v. SMT. NUPUR DAS GUPTA

WPC/4398/2021 · 2026-04-19

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17804 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4398 of 2021 1 - Nirmal Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Rampratap Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o Bramhroad Ambikapur P.S. And Tahsil - Ambikapur District -Surguja Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Nupur Das Gupta W/o Anand Das Gupta Aged About 47 Years R/o 56 Station Road, Dhakuriya Calcutta (Wb)through Seller Power Of Attorney Krishana Kumar Agrawal S/o Tarachand Agrawal, Caste- Agrawal Aged About 54 Years, R/o Jawahar Market Ambedkar Chowk Ambikapur District - Surguja (Cg) -Power Of Attorney Shri Vineet Shukla S/o Vijay Prakash Shukla Aged Abput 46 Years, By Caste-Bramhan, R/o Manendragarh Road Behind Hotel Shailgiri Ambikapur District - Surguja Cg - Adhikar Patra (Mukhtarnama Khass) Grahita. 2 - Smt. Sarla Agrawal W/o Krishna Kumar Agrawal By Caste Agrawal Aged About 50 Years R/o Jawahar Market Ambedkar Chowk Ambikapur District Surguja (Cg) (Non-Applicant/purchaser) 3 - The Collector, District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Surajpur District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Naib Tahsildar Latory District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhinav Dubey, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Sunil Tripathi, Advocate For State : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 20/04/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No. 01 of 2026, an application seeking withdrawal of the petition. Along with the said application, a cheque bearing No. 275633 dated 08.04.2026 towards refund of the earnest money has also been placed on record. 2. Considering the reasons assigned in the application, particularly those stated in paragraph 3 thereof, the application is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge