28-WP-10969-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10969 OF 2026 Tukaram Kana Bhoir & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus Chourang Gajanan Patil & Ors. …Respondents Mr. Raju Suryawanshi, i/b Mr. Rakesh Sharad Patil, for Petitioners. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the purported delay on the part of the learned Civil Judge, seized with Special Civil Suit No. 470/2019, in deciding an application for temporary injunction (Exh.5), though the arguments were heard by the learned Civil Judge in the month of 2025. 3. Mr. Suryawanshi, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, fairly submits that, though according to his instructions, the arguments were heard, yet, the fact that the arguments on the application (Exh.5) were heard, has not been recorded in the roznama. SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.10.01 21:09:10 +0530 28-WP-10969-2026.DOC 4. In these circumstances, without delving into the correctness of the assertions in the Petition, this Court considers it appropriate to request the learned Civil Judge seized with Special Civil Suit No. 470/2019 to hear and decide the application (Exh.5) as expeditiously as possible and, preferably, within a period of 8 weeks from the communication of this order. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed. 6. It is clarified that, this Court has not delved into the merits of the matter, including the relief sought in prayer clause (a) of this Petition. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2