Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14028 (PNJ)

MUNNAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/17877/2026 · 2026-04-30

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.17877 of 2026 Date of decision: 30.04.2026 Munnar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Aazam Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition under Section 482 BNSS (corresponding to Section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.91 dated 19.06.2024, under Sections 3/13(1) and 8/13(3), 17 of Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015 and Section 411 IPC {corresponding to Section 317(2) of BNS} registered at Police Station Bichhore, District Nuh, Haryana. 2. This Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 08.04.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required NEETU RANI 2026.04.30 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CRM-M No.17877 of 2026 -2- in the present case. 5. In view of the above, the order dated 08.04.2026 is made absolute. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 7. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 30.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.30 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD