Sonali Mane 31-RPW-116-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 116 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7111 OF 2023 Smita Madhav Deo And Anr. … Petitioners Versus Pandit Kautik Pawar And Ors. … Respondents Mr. Jayendra Khairnar a/w Ms. Gauri Kulkarni for Petitioners. Mr. Pratik Sabrad for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 29 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C. : 1) The Petition is filed seeking review of the Order dated 12 February 2026. 2) I have heard Mr. Khairnar, the learned counsel appearing for Petitioners and Mr. Sabrad, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. 3) After having considered the submissions canvassed by Mr. Khairnar, this Court is unable to trace any error apparent on the face of record in the Order dated 12 February 2026. The order under review is passed after considering the submissions canvassed on behalf ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 29 September 2026 MANE SONALI DILIP Digitally signed by MANE SONALI DILIP Date: 2026.10.01 14:25:38 +0530 Sonali Mane 31-RPW-116-2026.docx of the Petitioners when the Petition was heard and decided. The present Review Petition is filed as if it is an appeal in disguise. Mr. Khairnar has attempted to canvass additional points before me by relying on the concerned sale deed, which were not argued when order under review was passed on 12 February 2026. The Order cannot be reviewed on points not argued earlier. No case is made out for review of the order dated 12 February 2026. 4) The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] ___Page No. 2 of 2 ___ 29 September 2026