SURESH YALLAPPA GOLLAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
ABA/2477/2026 · 2026-10-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14025 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14025 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
921-ABA-2477-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2477 OF 2026 Suresh Yallappa Gollar …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Ms. Sana Raees Khan a/w. Mr. Parag Sawant, for the Applicant. Mrs. Savita M. Yadav, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Tariq Sayed, for Respondent No.2. Ms. C. A. Gadilwad, PSI, attached to Faraskhana Police Station, Pune, present. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED :
1st OCTOBER 2026 PC:-
1. At the outset, Mrs. Yadav, learned APP submits that there are three antecedents against the Applicant, however, the Applicant has mentioned only one antecedent in the Anticipatory Bail Application. Learned APP states that apart from C.R. No.235 of 2024, which is disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application, there are other two FIRs bearing C.R. No.11 of 2018 and 110 of 2023.
2. In view of the said contention raised by the learned APP, Ms. Khan, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks Page 1 Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.10.03 10:43:07 +0530
921-ABA-2477-2026.DOC withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by disclosing details of all the antecedents.
3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as aforesaid.
4. It is clarified that this Court has not considered the merits and all contentions on merits are expressly kept open.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Sonali