JOGESWAR BASUMATARY AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/1685/2026 · 2026-09-07
Shamima Jahan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14023 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14023 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010151092026
2026:GAU-AS:13058
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1685/2026 JOGESWAR BASUMATARY AND 2 ORS.
S/O LATE BHOJA HARI BASUMATARY, R/O VILLAGE DIGHALI, P.S.
DHUPDHARA, DISTRICT GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783123.
2: JYOTISH KHAKHALARY S/O BHAIRAB KHAKHALARY R/O KATHAKUTHI P.O. KATHAKUTHI P.S. DHUPDHARA DISTRICT GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783123.
3: CHANDAN KHAKHLARY S/O BHAIRAB KHAKHLARY R/O BENGDOBA KATHAKUTHI PART-V P.O. KATHAKUTHI P.S. DHUPDHARA DISTRICT GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783123 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S DEWRI, MR H BORAH,MR A DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER 08.09.2026 Heard Mr A Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. Mr Sarma submits that the charge sheet in the instant case has been laid vide C.S. No. 44/2026, dated 13.08.2026.
3. As such, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to move an application before the concerned Court.
4. Prayer is allowed.
5. However, the petitioner was enlarged on interim pre-arrest bail vide order dated 27.07.2026, and as such, this Court deems it fit to extend the said interim pre-arrest
order by another 15 (fifteen), so that the petitioner can avail his remedies before the concerned Court.
6. The petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant