CR-3477-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3477-2026 Date of decision: 23.04.2026 Madan Mohan Bajaj ...Pe oner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate for the pe oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Applica on under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC was filed by the pe oner before the trial Court beyond a period of 30 days, but without moving any applica on for condoning the delay. It is for that reason that the applica on has been dismissed by the trial Court and the order has been affirmed by the Appellate Court. Both those orders have been assailed before this Court, but learned counsel has made a prayer seeking permission to withdraw this pe on by gran ng liberty to move a fresh applica on before the trial Court concerned with liberty to file a fresh applica on under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC and by accompanying the same with an applica on under Sec on 5 of the Limita on Act to condone the delay. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present pe on is hereby disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. However, it is made clear that in case any such applica on is moved, the trial Court shall consider and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law. 23.04.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.04.23 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document