1 / 3 2026:CGHC:10691 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2053 of 2026 Dr. Chandra Shekhar Mohbe S/o Late Dr. M.M. Mohbe Aged About 71 Years R/o Srishti Colony, House No. 60, Near Kamla College Road, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Atal Bihari Vajpayee Memorial Medical College, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Office Of The Dean Bharat Ratna Late Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Memorial Medical College, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director Bharat Ratna Late Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Memorial Medical College, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension, Raipur, Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State : Mrs. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.03.03 10:45:20 +0530 2 / 3 Order on Board 02.03.2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking following reliefs:- 10.1 Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P-5) passed by Respondent no. 3. 10.2 Direct respondent no. 5 to reassess and refix the petitioner’s pension in accordance with Rule 12(3) and applicable pension rules within a time frame. 10.3 Direct payment of differential arrears with interest. 10.4 Grant any other relief deemed fit, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner at the outset submits that according to him the grievance which is raised by petitioner as also in the representation submitted by petitioner is to be considered by respondent no. 5, therefore, he may be permitted to submit fresh representation before the concerned authority and direction be issued to consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner at the earliest, within specified time frame. 3. Learned counsel for State submits that as petitioner is only seeking liberty to submit fresh representation before respondent no. 5, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, permitting petitioner to submit a representation before respondent no. 5 and, if such a representation is submitted, concerned respondent shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, 3 / 3 preferably within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of representation on its own merits. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza