Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14418 WP No. 11848 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11848 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT PAVITHRA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS W/O LATE SHIVANNA R/AT NARIHALLY VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. PAVITHRA (PARTY IN PERSON) ABSENT) AND:
1. RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA R/AT NARIHALLY VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573211.
2. KESHAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA R/AT NARIHALLY VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573211.
3.
VENKATEGOWDA @ VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA R/AT RAJGATTA, KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14418 WP No. 11848 of 2024
4. KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA R/AT GOWRIKOPPAL 1ST CROSS, HASSAN-573201.
5.
SMT. GOWRAMMA MAJOR W/O LATE RANGEGOWDA R/AT BASAVANAHALLY VILLAGE HASSAN-573201.
6.
SMT. PRAMEELA MAJOR W/O RANGASWAMYI R/AT NARIHALLY VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.
7.
SMT. VASANTHA MAJOR W/O SHEKAR R/AT NEAR LAND ARMY OFFICE HASSAN-573201. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR SIMILAR WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 08/01/2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN IN FDP NO. 11/2012 IN SO FAR AS AWARDING 1/8 SHARE IN EACH OF THE PROPERTIES PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14418 WP No. 11848 of 2024
ORAL ORDER This Court, by order dated 02.03.2026 has directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to retire from the case and directed the office to show the name of the petitioner in the cause-list.
2. Today, when the matter is called, neither the petitioner is present nor engaged any counsel. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 47