IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 220 CRWP-1647-2026 Date of Decision:-12.03.2026 GURDEV SINGH @ GURDEV SINGH SANDHU & OTHERS ......PETITIONERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Damanbir Singh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ekampal Sagoo, AAG, Punjab. (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI , J.(ORAL ) 1. The prayer in the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of directions to restore the security cover of the petitioner No.2 and her family members. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that adequate security be provided to the petitioners, who belong to a political family as they face a threat to their lives. 3. The learned State counsel has filed a reply dated 11.03.2026 which is taken on record. While referring to the said reply, he submits that initially in the year 2023, the petitioner No.1 was indeed facing a threat to his life and security was provided at that stage. On a reassessment, it has been found that neither he nor his family members need any security. However, a PCR has been deployed near the residence of the petitioner. KUSUM 2026.03.14 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRWP-1647-2026 -2- 4. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court, at this stage. 5. Disposed of. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 12.03.2026 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.03.14 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh