Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14007 (RAJ)

PAWAN KUMAR S/O NATHURAM KHATIK v. MAHENDRA SINGH S/O VIMLA DEVI @ MOOLI DEVI D/O BODURAM

CW/16997/2026 · 2026-08-25

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:34616] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16997/2026 CNR: RJHC020818622026 | URN: CW / 35547U / 2026 Pawan Kumar S/o Nathuram Khatik, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. S-53A, Kumawat Colony, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur - 302012 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mahendra Singh S/o Vimla Devi @ Mooli Devi D/o Boduram, R/o Village Beelpur, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur. 2. Suman Devi W/o Pawan Kumar, R/o House No. S-53A, Kumawat Colony, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur - 302012 3. Subregistrar Amer, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur. 4. Tehsildar Amer, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur. 5. Hemlata D/o Vimla Devi @ Mooli Devi D/o Boduram, R/o Village Beelpur, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur. Pin No.303104 6. Meera Devi D/o Vimla Devi @ Mooli Devi D/o Boduram, R/o Village Beelpur, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur. Pin No.303104 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartikay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order 25/08/2026 1. The case is admittedly pending before the Revenue Board, without availing the appropriate remedies of contesting the matter before the Revenue Board or moving appropriate application, directly writ petition has been filed, which in the opinion of this Court, would not be required to be entertained as the issue is still [2026:RJ-JP:34616] (2 of 2) [CW-16997/2026] pending before the Revenue Board who are competent to decide the matters and also examine the factual aspects. 2. In view thereto, the writ petition is dismissed. 3. All pending application also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ 41/Gaurav