PANKAJ RAO AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CRMMO/43/2026 · 2026-04-08
Rakesh Kainthla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 43 of 2026 Date of Decision : 8.4.2026 Pankaj Rao & another ...Petitioners Versus State of HP & another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioners : Mr. Shivanshu Attri, Advocate. For the respondent No.1/ State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.2 : None Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 8th April, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.