Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13998 (AP)

Y. Siva, S/o. Y. Venkata Ramana v. The Andhra Pradesh TRASCO Limited, Vidyuth Soudha

WP/6883/2017 · 2026-10-07

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010142052017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6883 OF 2017 Between: 1. Y. Siva, S/o. Y. Venkata Ramana,, Occ: Electrical Contractor, R/o. Permanent Motukupalle, H/o. Ghattu Village, B. Kothakota Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Andhra Pradesh TRASCO Limited Vidyuth Soudha, Erramanzil, Hyderabad, Rep.by its Chief Engineer. 2. The Divisional Engineer/Technical AP TRANSCO Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3. The Chief Engineer FAC AP TRANSCO Kadapa Zone Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The Divisional Engineer Operations AP TRANSCO, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 5. N Khaja Khan Kukarasapalli Village Thamballapalli, Mandal, Madanapalli Division, Chittoor District. 6. B Kala Krishna Kukarasapalli Village Thamballapalli, Mandal, Madanapalli Division, Chittoor District ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent Tender Notification Proceedings No.CE/ KDPZ/KDP/DE-T/ADE-T1/AE-T2/F.Doc/ D.No.3198/16,dated: 03.12.2016 (Open Tender Notice-40/16-17) without considering the petitioner's candidature is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to proceed further in respect Tender Notification Proceedings No.CE/KDPZ/KDP/DE-T/ADE-T1/AE-T2/F.Doc/D.No.3198/16,dated: 03.12.2016 (Open Tender' Notice-40/16-17) including entering the agreement and allotment work 53/16-17 and 54/16-17 in favour of the respondents 5 and 6, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 8447 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to proceed further in respect Tender Notification Proceedings No. CE/KDPZ/KDP/DE-T/ADE-T1/AE-T2/F.Doc / D.No. 3198/16, dated 03-12-2016 (Open Tender Notice - 40/16-17) including entering the agreement and allotment work 53/16-17 and 54/16-17 in favour of the respondents 5 and 6, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents: Counsel for the Respondents:N SIVA REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6883 OF 2017 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 08.10.2026 TTPPSS 4 82 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6883 OF 2017 08.10.2026 TTPPSS