Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13993 (CHH)

(Deleted) PREMA CHANDRAWANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4909/2022 · 2026-04-20

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18242 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4909 of 2022 1 - (Deleted) Prema Chandrawanshi As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 21- 08-2024. 2 - Geeta Thakur D/o Uderam Tahkur, Aged About 28 Years R/o House No. 22, Ward No. 01, Village Bijebhatha, Post Diwanbhedi, Tahsil Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 491661. ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Public Instructions Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur. Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, Bastar Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/04/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble court may kindly be issued a writ of mandamus / certiorari or of like nature to quash the order/communication dated 17.06.2022 Annexure P/5 with further direction to respondent to admit/accept the TET certificate of the petitioners and to the consider the petitioner to be eligible for the selection/appointment on the post of Assistant teacher. 10.2 That, a command/direction may kindly be issued against the respondents to produce the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.22 11:04:48 +0530 2 and a consider the candidature of the petitioner being eligible for the selection and appointment on the post of teacher. 10.3 Any other relief which is deemed fit and proper may also be Awarded to the petitioner against the respondents including cost of the petition.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. R.K. Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti