2026:JHHC:6674 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 12122 of 2025 --------- 1. Tilak Pawan @ Tilas Pawan aged about 46 Years son of Sukar Paswan. 2. Binod Paswan aged about 32 Years son of Chhotu Paswan. 3. Mukesh Paswan aged about 20 Years son of Chhotu Paswan. All resident of Village Kumbhatand, P.O. Mandramo, P.S. Sariya District- Giridih, (Jharkhand). ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. For the Informant : Ms. Kehkashan Afsheen, Advocate --------- 03/Dated:-12.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(4), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1), 324(3), 352, 61(2) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and they have committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that and the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are cultivators and petitioner No.3 is a student having no criminal antecedent and he has only been implicated in this case because he is the brother of the petitioner No.2-Binod Paswan. He further submits that the petitioners for no offence have been languishing in custody since 12.10.2025; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioner No.1 and 2. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against petitioner No.3 namely, Mukesh Paswan coupled with the fact that the petitioner No.3 is a student and he has only been implicated because he is the brother of the petitioner No.2 and also that he is in custody since 12.10.2025; therefore, I am 2026:JHHC:6674 2 inclined to enlarge petitioner No.3, namely, Mukesh Paswan on bail. Accordingly, petitioner No.3 is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist Class, Giridih in connection with Sariya P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner No.3 shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against petitioner No.3, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner No.3. 7. So far as petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, having regard to the allegations made against them and looking to the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge these petitioners on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 stands rejected. (Deepak Roshan, J.) March 12, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 18.03.2026