Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1399 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD DAWOOD S/O MOHAMMAD AHMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4363/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13565] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4363/2026 Mohammad Dawood S/o Mohammad Ahmad, R/o Talaab Wali Maszid Ke Pass, Village Dhokpuri Tanda, Tehsil Swar, P.S. Ajeem Nagar, District Rampur (U.P.) At Present House Number 367-C, Talwandi, P.S. Jawahar Nagar, Kota. (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 01/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 32/2026 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 105 & 110 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 25.02.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:13565] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4363/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 25.02.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Mohammad Dawood S/o Mohammad Ahmad is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/59