10.02.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.17 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 102 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Haripal Police Station Case No. 553 of 2023 dated 09.12.2023 under Sections 420/406/467/ 468/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code (G.R. Case No. 2166 of 2023). And In Re : Supriya Biswas @ Dustu ... Petitioner. Mr. Bitasok Banerjee, Mr. Abdus Salam ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, APP, Mr. Sujan Chatterjee ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 2 years and only three witnesses have been examined out of 19 witnesses cited in the charge-sheet. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the facts of the case which relate to a fake racket operating for providing job at AIIMS and as Shiksha Bandhu for teaching purposes. Four accused persons are in custody and trial of the case is in progress. Only three witnesses have been examined; two more victims are left to be examined. At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 2 Report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 102 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)