1 2ca10931.26 prodction .odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10931 OF 2026 IN WP/8747/2026 KESHAV BHAUSAHEB KALE VERSUS PANDIT DINDAYAL NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shubham Pawar h/f Mr. Rahul R. Karpe Advocate for Respondent No. 1 in WP : Mr. S.R. Andhale … CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 30.09.2026 PER COURT : 1. This application is filed by the applicant seeking clarification to the order date 14.08.2026, whereby the Maharashtra State Co- Operative Appellate Court, Mumbai Bench at Aurangabad was directed to hear the application for condonation of delay in the appeal pending before it. It is submitted that in the order dated 14.08.2026, this Court has passed an order directing that the application of condonation of delay be heard alongwith the appeal on 27.08.2026. This order directing to hear the application on 27.08.2026 is passed on the back ground of the fact that during the course of the arguments, this Court was informed that the hearing of appeal itself was scheduled on 27.08.2026 therefore, this Court had passed this order to hear the application of condonation application alongwith the appeal on 27.08.2026. However, it goes without saying that the application for condonation of delay needs to be heard prior to the hearing of the appeal. 2 2ca10931.26 prodction .odt 2. The prayer made in the Civil Application is opposed by the learned Advocate for the respondent, I have taken note of the objection raised by the learned Advocate for the respondent. 3. However, by way of clarification, if any ambiguity remains in the order, it is made clear that the application for condonation of delay needs to be decided prior to the decision of the appeal. 4. With the aforementioned observations the Civil Application stands disposed of. 5. The parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. ( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ) Mahajansb/