IN THE H M/s Neelkanth T State of Haryana CORAM : HO HO Present : Ms Mr DEEPAK SIBA It i preceded the im of supportive d thereto. 2. In dated 04.02.202 therefore, quash proceed afresh 3. The 06.05.2026 Prince Whether speaking/re Whether reportable Sr. No.320 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP- 4813 Date of Deci kanth Traders Versus aryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Ms. Ambika Jindal, Advocate for th Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Har *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that though in th the impugned adjudication order, ther rtive documents but no supportive In the light of the above, the im 02.2025 would be violative of princip quashed. However, liberty is gran fresh against the petitioner, in accordan The petition is allowed in the above (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU king/reasoned : Yes/No rtable : Yes/No JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 4813-2026 f Decision :06.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI for the petitioner. ., Haryana. h in the show cause notice which r, there is reference to attachment rtive documents were appended impugned adjudication order principles of natural justice and is s granted to the respondents to cordance with law. above terms. EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.05.08 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document