Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13981 (JHR)

BALRAM UPADHYAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1565/2025 · 2026-03-26

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8773 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1565 of 2025 -- Balram Upadhyay, aged about 63 years, son of Late Amarnath Upadhyay, resident of Baskola, P.O. Bairani, P.S. Kahalgaon, District Bhagalpur, Bihar ..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Sharma, son of not known to the petitioner, the Registrar, Sidho Kanho Murmu University, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand ..Opposite parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Kumar Ambasta, Advocate For the O.P-State : Mr. Anshuman Kumar, A.C to SC(L&C)-II For the O.P.-S.K.M University ; Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Advocate -- 03/26.03.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that though a reasoned order has been passed in this case that is against the petitioner; however similarly situated persons, in L.P.A. No. 109 of 2019; 111 of 2019 and 113 of 2019, have been given the benefits which have not been given to the petitioner; accordingly, the instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the reasoned order dated 30.01.2026, if so advised. 2. Having regard to the above, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty, as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 26th March, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 01/04/2026