On 10.04.2026, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel inter alia contends that the petitioner is an agriculturist and had no concern with the vocation of travel agency. He has been falsely implicated in the case only on account of the fact that there was an between him and the complainant, with regard to which, a civil suit has been filed by the petitioner. Besides it, the complainant had borrowed transactions from him, out of which, he had returned lacs but the same was not on the pretext of sending his son abroad. He is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. On 10.04.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel inter alia contends that the petitioner agriculturist and had no concern with the vocation of falsely implicated in the case only on account of the fact that there was an agreement to sell between him and the complainant, with regard to which, a suit has been filed by the petitioner. Besides it, the rrowed Rs.17 lacs in different transactions from him, out of which, he had returned Rs.4.5 lacs but the same was not on the pretext of sending his son not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.28 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr. Navrajdeep Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of the complainant. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 17.04.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482 (2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 28.04.2026.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Rajesh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 10.04.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.28 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.