Satish Kumar Singh @ Satish Kr. Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./26996/2026 · 2026-05-06
Sandeep Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13971 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13971 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26996 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-582 Year-2024 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Satish Kumar Singh @ Satish Kr. Singh S/o Pramod Yadav R/o Village - Kajrai, P.S - NTPC Khaira, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Hitachi Cash Management Services Pvt. Ltd. through Shubham Srivastwa, Branch Manager 90ft, Hanumannagar, Near Indian Bank, Kankarbagh, Patna - 800020 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 582 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 316(2), 316(3), 316(5), 318(4), 303(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is accused of misappropriating Rs. 59,69,000/- belonging to the company and out of the misappropriated amount, he has returned a part thereof.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26996 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that she has no instruction with regard to the balance amount. Petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the huge misappropriation committed by the petitioner and other co-accused persons, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T