Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13971 (ALL)

GYANENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA528/14765/2026 · 2026-10-08

Gautam Chowdhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14765 of 2026 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, Shri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel counsel for the Power Corporation, as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed with the prayer to set aside the cognizance/ summoning order dated 11.02.2025 as well as for quashing of the charge sheet dated 22.05.2024 including the entire proceeding of Special Sessions Trial No. 114 of 2025, State Vs. Gyanendra Pratap Singh), arising out of Case Crime No. 0198 of 2022, under Section 135(1)(a) of Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003, Police Station Anti Power Theft, District Fatehpur, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (E.C. Act), Fatehpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that since offence in question is compoundable and the applicant is ready to settle the matter, therefore, some time may be granted to him for the said purpose and to approach the authority concerned under Section 152 of the Electricity Act. 4. Learned counsel for the Power Corporation as well as learned A.G.A. has no objection, if the offence is compounded under the relevant provision of the Electricity Act. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of case and having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for parties and keeping in view the willingness shown by learned counsel for applicant, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this application pending. 6. In view of above, it is provided that in case, the applicant moves an application for compounding under the relevant provisions of Electricity Act before the concerned authority within two weeks from today along Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Avdhesh Kumar Yadav, G.A., Sundeep Shukla Gyanendra Pratap Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) with the certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, the same shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks months from the date of production of same after hearing the parties concerned. 7. 7. For a period of two months or till the disposal of said application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant in the aforesaid case. 8. In case of default on the part of applicant, interim protection granted to applicant shall automatically come to an end. 9. With the aforesaid observations, this application stands finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 Mustaqeem. NA528 No. 14765 of 2026 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad