Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13968 (MAD)

M.SAKKARAPANI v. The Revenue Divisional officer

WP/11334/2026 · 2026-04-02

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 11334 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 11334 of 2026 M.Sakkarapani S/o.Late.Muthukaruppa Patayatchi Door No.4/158,Kattukottai Aarathi Agrakaram village Kamakkapalayam post Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District -636 112 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Division Salem District. 2. The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District. 3. The Head surveyor Tahsildar Office Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District. 4. M.Rangan S/o.Late.Muthukaruppa Patayatchi Kattukottai Aarathi Agrakaram Village Kamakkapalayam Post Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District-636 112. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to pass orders https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11334 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 on the representation dated 04.02.2026 by conducting enquiry by giving sufficient opportunity to petitioner and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Velu For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader for RR1 to 3 For R4 – Notice dispensed with ORDER The petitioner seeks for online updation of the revenue records for the subject property more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition. The petitioner had given a representation on 04.02.2026 to the 1st respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 2. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if a direction is issued to the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 04.02.2026, seeking for updation of the online revenue records maintained by the respondents for the subject property, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 3. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. Since no adverse order is passed as against the 4th respondent in this Writ Petition, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11334 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the 1st respondent to pass final order on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 04.02.2026, seeking for updation of the online revenue records, in favour of the petitioner for the property more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents to be produced by the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Jer To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Division Salem District. 2. The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District. 3. The Head surveyor Tahsildar Office Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11334 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. Jer WP No. 11334 of 2026 02-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis