Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13964 (MAD)

S.SOUNDAR v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/10373/2026 · 2026-03-24

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 10373 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 10373 of 2026 S.Soundar S/o. Subramani, Mepatthurai Village, Tennakaram Post Office, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office of the Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai-606 604 2. The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai-606 604. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 13.02.2023 and 08.12.2025 and decide the same in accordance with law within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10373 of 2026 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 13.02.2023 and 08.12.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner who claims to belong to the Scheduled Case community claims that he is entitled for patta for the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition. He also claims that the property has been encroached by certain encroachers. The petitioner had given representations on 13.02.2023 as well as on 08.12.2025, to the respondents requesting them to remove the encroachment and grant patta in his favour for the subject property. Since the said representations were not considered, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representations as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10373 of 2026 law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representations. 5.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 13.02.2023 and 08.12.2025, referred to supra, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA To 1. The District Collector Office of the Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai-606 604 2. The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai-606 604. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10373 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA WP No. 10373 of 2026 24-03-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis