Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1396 (RAJ)

RAJA ALI S/O ABDUL GAFFAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1904/2026 · 2026-04-08

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14598] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1904/2026 Raja Ali S/o Abdul Gaffar, R/o Purana Chhabda Rasta, Chhipabardo, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran Ra- jasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Dhaka, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the ac- cused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0249/2025 registered at Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran for offences under Sections 103(1), 331(8) of BNS 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely being friend of other co-accused. He further submits that accused-petitioner is in custody since since long and Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned counsel Public prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that cello tape and iron rod are recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner which was used by the [2026:RJ-JP:14598] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1904/2026] accused persons for putting it on the mouth of the deceased so that he cannot raise his voice. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers. 5. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that some of the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is di- rected that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /29