HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9650 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Union of India, Shri Sudarshan Singh, submits that the instant writ petition has primarily been filed challenging the award passed by the Arbitrator/District Magistrate. He further submits that the petitioner has an efficacious statutory remedy of filing an objection under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 4. In view of the aforesaid, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition on the ground of availability of an efficacious alternative remedy. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Needless to say, the petitioners can avail the alternative remedy, if so advised. October 6, 2026 Mukesh Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Chauhan, Basant Kumar Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Sudarshan Singh, Ugrasen Kumar Pandey (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Sureshchandra And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad