Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13952 (JHR)

SINA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1612/2026 · 2026-03-12

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6595 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1612 of 2026 ------ Sina Yadav, son of Late Mohan Yadav, resident of Village Masuriya, P.O. Chak, P.S. Manatu, District Palamau, State Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P. ------ Order No.02 / Dated : 12.03.2026 Bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner- Sina Yadav, who is in custody since 27.01.2026 in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 arising out of Manatu P.S. Case No. 27 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 18(B) and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Palamau, is pressed into motion. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the matter involves cultivation of opium in forest area. It is further submitted that there is no material except confessional statement of the co- accused Rajgeer Ganjhu, who has been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and other similarly situated co-accused persons have also been granted bail. Learned A.P.P. opposed the bail petition. Under the circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below and security deposit of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand). (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit Uploaded 13.03.2026