Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13951 (CHH)

SHRI REVATI RAMAN NAG v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3853/2026 · 2026-05-04

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:20935 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3853 of 2026 Shri Revati Raman Nag S/o Late Laleshwar Nag Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Khartha, Vikas Khand Charama, District Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Development Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Additional Commissioner Tribal Department, District Kanker (C.G.) 3 - Collector District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Head Master Govt. Girls Middle School, Lakhanpuri, Block Charama, District Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiya, G.A. HON'BLE SHRI PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE ORDER ON BOARD 05.05.2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to grant the petitioner due seniority and consequential benefits, including increments, with effect from the year 2016, along with arrears; 10.5) Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court deems fit & proper may kindly be pleased to granted in favor of the petitioner;” 2 / 2 2. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to respondent No. 4 - District Education Officer, to take decision on the pending representation dated 03.09.2024, at the earliest. 3. Counsel for State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners 4. On due consideration of submission of counsel for the parties, without entering into merits of this case, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.09.2024, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE