Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13946 (KAR)

SRI D RANGASWAMAIAH v. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

WP/24395/2025 · 2026-02-27

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12369 WP No. 24395 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 24395 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI D RANGASWAMAIAH S/O. LATE DODDARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, WORKING AS SECRETARY, KUNIGAL TOWN, MEENUGARARA AND MEENU BALAKEDARARA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA, KOTHIPURA, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT 572101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH.R.P., ADV.) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TUMAKURU SUB-DIVISION, TUMAKURU, TUMAKURU DISTRICT 572101 Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12369 WP No. 24395 of 2025 2. KUNIGAL TOWN MEENUGARARA AND MEENU BALAKEDARARA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT KOTHIPURA, HERUR POST, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT 572101 REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1, SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADV. FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, AND TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.24/6/2025 ALONG WITH LETTER DTD.8/7/2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1, IN NO.SANI- 32/DAAVA/CR.01/2004-05 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND F1 RESPECTIVELY. B. ISSUE SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS MAY BE DEEMED FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12369 WP No. 24395 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the order of termination before the appropriate authority. 2. The memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB