SUBHASH CHAND PAREEK (SENIOR CITIZEN) S/O SHRI NATHULAL v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/8848/2026 · 2026-08-24
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13944 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13944 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:34159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8848/2026 CNR: RJHC020461892026 | URN: CW / 19576U / 2026 Subhash Chand Pareek (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Aluda, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpora- tion, Sikar Depot, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8847/2026 CNR: RJHC020461822026 | URN: CW / 19575U / 2026 Mohan Lal (Senior Citizen) S/o Shri Ramdev Singh, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Mukam Post Katraghal, District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpora- tion, Sikar Depot, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ghiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 24/08/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:34159] (2 of 2) [CW-8848/2026]
Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement and jointly submit that the controversy involved herein is squarely covered by the order dated 13.08.2026 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15295/2026 titled Om Prakash Sharma v. RSRTC and Anr. and pray that the present matter may also be
disposed of in similar terms. In light of the consensus arrived at between the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the order passed in Om Prakash Sharma (supra), the present petition stands disposed of in same terms. It is directed that the ratio encapsulated in the judgment of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the present petitioner as well. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J 96/JUBIN