[2026:RJ-JP:35750] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 356/2022 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 676/2022 CNR: RJHC020241902022 | URN: CCP / 372U / 2022 Dheeru Singh Gurjar S/o Ramroop Gurjar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Dubbi, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan- 303304. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Dr. Joga Ram, Additional Principal Secretary Cum Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Hridesh Kumar Sharma, Director And Joint Secretary, Local Self Government Department, G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan. 4. Narendra Kumar Verma, Deputy Director (Administration), Local Self Government Department, G- 3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan. 5. Narsi Lal Meena, Executive Officer, Municipality, Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 348/2022 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 668/2022 CNR: RJHC020241932022 | URN: CCP / 364U / 2022 Umashankar Gurjar S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Khedla, Post Teogoan, Tehsil Nadouti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Additional Principal [2026:RJ-JP:35750] (2 of 3) [CCP-356/2022] Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Dr. Joga Ram, Additional Principal Secretary Cum Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Hridesh Kumar Sharma, Director And Joint Secretary, Local Self Government Department, G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan. 4. Narendra Kumar Verma Deputy Director (Administration), Local Self Government Department , G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme, Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan. 5. Yogesh Kumar Pipal, Executive Officer, Municipality Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 357/2022 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 678/2022 CNR: RJHC020241872022 | URN: CCP / 373U / 2022 Pawan Gurjar S/o Ramniwas Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Banari, Bhuri-Bharaj, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Dr. Joga Ram, Additional Principal Secretary Cum Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Hridesh Kumar Sharma, Director And Joint Secretary, Local Self Government Department, G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan. 4. Narendra Kumar Verma, Deputy Director (Administration), Local Self Government Department, G- 3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan. [2026:RJ-JP:35750] (3 of 3) [CCP-356/2022] 5. Suresh Kumar Verma, Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Viratnagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Choudhary, and Mr. Yadvendra Patel, for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 03/09/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that though vide Order No.6802 dated 25.05.2026 issued by the Director and Joint Secretary, Local Self Government Department, the petitioner has been reinstated, however, solely on the whims and fancies of the respondents, the compliance of the interim order dated 10.02.2022 has been made after the passage of more than four years. 2. Considering the above submissions, the order dated 25.05.2026 and also the fact that the writ petitions, wherein the interim order dated 10.02.2022 was passed by this Court, are pending, the present contempt petitions are disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all their grievances in the writ petitions. 3. With the aforesaid directions, the present contempt petitions stand disposed of. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 5. Notices stand discharged. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 40-42/VINAY