Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13937 (AP)

Anu Majhi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/9023/2026 · 2026-10-15

Y Lakshmana Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010539322026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 16th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9023/2026 Between: 1. ANU MAJHI, S/O. GURUSHA MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,R/O. PILLIPAJU VILLAGE, ANTARABA PANCHAYAT, MOHAN BLOCK,GAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE. 2. ABHI MAJHI, S/O. MAHASHA MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,R/O. PILLIPAJU VILLAGE, ANTARABA PANCHAYAT, MOHAN BLOCK,GAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE. 3. SAUL MAJHI, ,M/O. TRUCHI MAJHI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,R/O. PILLIPAJU VILLAGE, ANTARABA PANCHAYAT, MOHAN BLOCKGAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. BALABHADRUNI MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 439(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity „the Cr.P.C.,‟)/Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity „the BNSS‟), seeking to modify the condition imposed on the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 vide order dated 13.07.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.288 of 2026 in Crime No.29 of 2026 of Battili Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam (for brevity „the learned Trial Court‟). 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the financial condition of the Petitioners is deplorable and they are unable to comply with the conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 13.07.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.288 of 2026 in Crime No.29 of 2026 of Battili Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 is hereby modified as under: “The Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 shall be enlarged on bail on their executing personal bond for a Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten 3 Thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kothuru.” 5. The residual conditions imposed by „the learned Trial Court‟ in the original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 16.10.2026 VMM 4 50 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.9023 of 2026 Date: 16.10.2026 VMM