Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13935 (KAR)

MS THRUSHA v. SMT DEEPA PILLAI

WP/21480/2022 · 2026-03-11

Vijaykumar A Patil

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14623 WP No. 21480 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 21480 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MS THRUSHA (MS. THRISHA JAIN) AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS D/O PRAMEELA SUDHAKAR JAIN NOORALBETTU VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK UDUPI …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERESH M. UPPIN., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT DEEPA PILLAI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI TENNIS CLUB ENCLAVE KOWDIAR VILLAGE - 695 003 TIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA STATE …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 16.08.2022 IN M.A.NO.03/2019 DTD 16.08.2022 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, AT KARKALA ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14623 WP No. 21480 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled in the Lok Adalat and as such the writ petition is rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8