Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) C. P. 653-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 653 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO 5957 OF 2026 MANTHAN MOHAN NIMBALKAR VERSUS SNEHAL A. GOVEKAR ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr. Kishor T. Shirrurkar A.G.P. for Respondent/State : Mr. A. S. Shinde ....
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
ORDER
1. Heard.
2. Though the petition is filed for contempt of the order passed by this Court directing the respondent/Scrutiny Committee to decide tribe claim of the petitioner within certain period, but today the learned A.G.P., on instructions, submits that the tribe claim, which is pending before the respondent/Scrutiny Committee will be decided within three weeks from today.
3. We record the statement of learned A.G.P. as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of this petition. It is made clear that if the
(2) C. P. 653-2026.odt tribe claim is not decided within a stipulated period, the Scrutiny Committee would face aggravated form of contempt.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/