PRATIMA SANTOSHKUMAR MISHRA v. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
WP/12863/2026 · 2026-10-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13928 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13928 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
910. WP 12863-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12863 OF 2026
Pratima Santoshkumar Mishra … Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority (MHADA), And Ors. … Respondents ….. Mr. Priyanshu Mishra for the Petitioner. Adv. Jaya Bagwe a/w Mr. Manthan Joil for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and
3. …..
CORAM: M.S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 1st OCTOBER 2026 P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
2. Our attention is invited to the several prayers, which are made in the Petition. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner would be satisfied, if the representation dated 11th June, 2026, which is at page no.73 of the Petition, being made to the The Executive Engineer and The Deputy Engineer, G/South Division, M.B.R. & R.B., MHADA, Mumbai, is decided expeditiously. The RaJesh Chittewan, PS 1/2
910. WP 12863-2026.doc
learned Counsel for the Respondents have no objection for the same. Hence, the present Writ Petition is allowed.
3. The representation dated 11th June, 2026, made to to the The Executive Engineer and The Deputy Engineer, G/South Division, M.B.R. & R.B., MHADA, Mumbai, be decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today.
4. The Petition stands disposed of.
5. All the contentions of the parties on merits are kept open.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) RaJesh Chittewan, PS 2/2 RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Digitally signed by RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.10.03 13:11:37 +0530