Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13921 (KAR)

SRI SOMASHEKARACHARI R v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

WP/23937/2022 · 2026-03-18

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16049 WP No. 23937 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.23937 OF 2022 (S-R) BETWEEN: SRI SOMASHEKARACHARI R S/O. LATE SRI RUDRACHARI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS MADIHALLI POST, TIPTUR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH P KULKARNI AND SRI. VINAY SHREYAS K.V., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA (ERSTWHILE STATE BANK OF MYSORE) K G ROAD BENGALURU-560 009. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR STATE BANK OF INDIA STATE BANK BHAVAN MADAME CAMA MARG MUMBAI-400 021. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P. MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER HIS REQUEST AT ANNEXURES – E1 AND F1 TO GRANT OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS LIKE PF, GRATUITY, PENSION ETC., AND RELEASE THE SAME TO HIM. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MADHURI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16049 WP No. 23937 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs: “i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the respondents to consider his request (Annexure-E-1 and F-1) to grant to retirement benefits like PF, gratuity, pension etc. and release the same to him; and ii) Grant such other or further orders as deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that his representations at Annexures – E1 and F1 dated 05.10.2020 and 05.11.2020 submitted to the respondents have not been considered so far by the respondents nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court by way of present petition. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, the respondents would consider and pass necessary order on the said representations. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16049 WP No. 23937 of 2022 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, the concerned respondent is hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioners and consider his representations requesting for grant of retirement benefits like PF, gratuity, pension, etc., at Annexures – E1 and F1 dated 05.10.2020 and 05.11.2020 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Subject to the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59