Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13914 (KAR)

SRI NARAYANA ACHARY v. SRI MAHALINGA GANIGA

RSA/2200/2023 · 2026-03-06

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13669 RSA No. 2200 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2200 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NARAYANA ACHARY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. SRI CHANDRAYYA ACHARY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. SRI BHASKAR ACHARY AGED BOUT 46 YEARS, 4. SRI SADASHIVA ACHARY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. NO.1 TO 4 ARE CHILDREN OF HERIYANNA ACHARY. 5. SRI MANJUNATHA ACHARY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 6. SRI RAMA ACHARY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, NO.5 AND 6 ARE CHILDREN OF SUBBANNA ACHARY, R/AT BALADDINAMANE, Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13669 RSA No. 2200 of 2023 POST HERANJAL VILLAGE 576219, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI MAHALINGA GANIGA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE SUBBAYYA GANIGA, KADKEMANE, POST HERANJAL VILLAGE 576219, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.06.2023 PASSED IN RA.No.6/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.09.2012 PASSED IN OS No.148/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13669 RSA No. 2200 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT Matter was passed over and called again. 2. Though matter was listed for non-compliance of office objection for V time and adjournment having been granted on cost earlier, there is no compliance. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6