CRL OP No. 6452 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 6452 of 2026 Sakthivel ..Petitioner Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police Thirumullaivoyal Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Crime No. 11/2026. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.01.2026 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 125, 311, 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner along with other accused persons allegedly waylaid the defacto https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6452 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 complainant, demanded money from him and when he refused, they abused him in filthy language, assaulted him and extorted a sum of Rs.950/- at knife point. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 13.01.2026 and since then he has been in judicial custody. The learned counsel would further submit that the present case is a false and foisted case. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent strongly opposed the bail application on the ground that petitioner has about fifteen previous criminal cases pending against him and would further submit that this is the second bail petition filed by the petitioner and there is no change in circumstances. He would further submit that if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of his committing further offences and disturbing public peace. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6452 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. From the submission of the learned counsel on either side, considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, and from the absence of change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12-03-2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police Thirumullaivoyal Police Station, Thiruvallur District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6452 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. sma CRL OP No. 6452 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis