- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15316 WP No. 18776 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 18776 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. RAMAKRISHNA R R S/O LATE RAJA RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/AT NO. 24/3/3 4TH SHOP LANE NEAR YADIYUR LAKE TATA SILK FARM BASAVANAGUDI BENGLAURU 560 001 REP BY HIS GPA HOLDER L GIRI S/O L GURUNADHA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RA/T NO.18,19/773 GIRIJA NILAYA 2ND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS NISARGA LAYOUT CHIKKALASANDRA BENGALURU 560 061 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. B. PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15316 WP No. 18776 of 2025 AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE BENGALURU 560 001 2. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER BOMMANAHALLI ZONE OFFICE BEGURU ROAD BOMMANAHALLI BENGALURU 560 061 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UTTARAHALLI SUB DIVISION BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BENGALURU 560 061 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING BOMMANAHALLI ZONE OFFICE BEGURU ROAD BOMMANAHALI BENGALURU 560 068 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROVISIONAL ORDER DTD. 05.10.2024 ISSUED BY R-4 UNDER SECTION 248(1) OF BBMP ACT, BEARING NO. SA.NI.NA.YOO/BOO.VA/P.O/456/24-25 VIDE ANNX-D; QUASH THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DTD. 05.10.2024 UNDER SECTION 248(2) ISSUED BY THE R-4 BEARING NO. SA.NI.NA.YOO/BOO.VA/P.O/456/24-25 VIDE ANNX-E; QUASH THE DEMOLITION ORDER DTD. 21.04.2025 PASSED BY THE R- 2 BEARING NO. SA.KAA.AA/UU.UU.V/BOVA/PR(27)456/2025-26 VIDE ANNX-F. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15316 WP No. 18776 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the action initiated by the respondents against the petitioner on the allegation that petitioner has put up construction in violation of the building Bye-laws and the sanctioned plan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some of the construction said to have been put up in violation of the sanction plan and building Bye-laws can be saved due to the amended regulations concerning the same. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents upon instructions, submits that if the petitioner were to make a suitable representation to respondent No. 4, the same would be considered in accordance with law. 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the following. ORDER [a] The writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15316 WP No. 18776 of 2025 representation to respondent no. 4 for grant of modified sanction plan. [b] Respondent no. 4 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. [c] Any deviations pursuant to the said order shall be removed by the petitioner. [d] The impugned orders shall be kept in abeyance till any decision is taken by respondent no. 4 in this regard. [e] The representation shall be made by the petitioner within a period of two [2] weeks from today, failing which, the respondents are at liberty to initiate appropriate action in accordance with law. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE RB